
We’ve been looking at this image for a few years, and while it’s often said to feature U.S. actress Anita Page, there’s an amazing amount of disagreement about that. Many sites say this is actually an actress named Marie Hopkins. The debate is a fascinating microcosm of internet behavior. We’ve seen people called stupid over their opinion. Well, we’ll try to weigh in, and hopefully not in a stupid way, about whether this is Page or Hopkins.
Some sites, splitting the difference, essentially claim both, saying this is Marie Hopkins posed as Anita Page, or Marie Hopkins posing under the pseudonym Anita Page. Here’s the problem with that: there’s no Marie Hopkins listed in cinema or stage databases. There’s a Miriam Hopkins, from the right period, but even so, this is probably not her. For clues toward an answer we’re turning to the pros—i.e. professional brick and mortar galleries.
Black & Whites Gallery is no longer around, but from its London locale during the 1980s and into the 1990s it staged shows by renowned photographers such as Richard Sawdon Smith and David Leslie Anthony. That gives it at least something resembling reputability, because when galleries with actual street addresses sell art with mistaken attributions or under false pretenses, it has a way of turning into a reputational problem that’s hard to shake among the habitués of the gallery scene. This is not nearly as true of online sellers.
So for the record: Black & Whites Gallery, once located at 50-52 Monmouth Street, London, sold limited lithographs of this image and identified the subject as the actress Anita Page, shot by Clarence Sinclair Bull in 1929. Is that 100% definitive? Maybe not, but it’s getting into the neighborhood. You can see a previous Page here.